EUROPE-IS-US

  Ukraine at a Crossroads: A War of Endurance Without Easy Endings Summary The war in Ukraine has entered a dangerous equilibrium. Russia and Ukraine, backed by very different coalitions, are locked into a conflict where neither side can win outright in the short term, yet neither side is ready to concede. Financing remains sustainable, industrial capacities are being ramped up on both sides, and manpower — though stretched — is still sufficient to fuel the war. The result is a grinding stalemate, but one with escalating costs for all involved. What makes this war unusual is that its 'hard factors' — money, production, manpower — are balanced, though at ever higher levels of intensity. Russia draws on oil revenues and support from Iran, North Korea, and China. Ukraine relies on U.S. and EU funding and industrial commitments that are only now scaling up. Both sides absorb terrible losses but continue to adapt technologically, especially through drones and electronic wa...

INTRODUCTION As Moldovans head to the polls today, September 28, their parliamentary election is not just a domestic contest—it’s a battleground for Europe’s future. Russia is waging an aggressive campaign to sway voters against the EU, using disinformation, economic pressure, and political manipulation. With the help of Mistral AI, we break down Moscow’s tactics and the anti-EU narratives shaping this pivotal vote. 1. Russia’s Goals in Moldova Prevent EU Integration: Russia aims to derail Moldova’s EU accession process, which began in 2024. Moldova’s alignment with the EU is seen as a direct threat to Moscow’s regional influence [1,2,3,4]. Destabilize Democracy: By sowing discord and undermining trust in institutions, Moscow seeks to create a weak, divided government that could pivot back toward Russian influence [1,5,6]. 2. Key Anti-EU Arguments & Disinformation Tactics A. False Narratives About EU Intentions “EU Occupation”: Russian-backed campaigns claim the EU a...

ARTICLE European Strategic Autonomy in the Age of US-China Competition The three images of EU strategic autonomy: perspectives on wedging, binding and hedging Daniel Fiott  Published online: 13 Sep 2025 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07036337.2025.2537369#abstract SUMMARY of ARTICLE MISTRAL.ai; 26-09-2025 = Three Models for Improving                     European Union Strategic Autonomy = 1. Responsibility Approach: ·   Enhances security and defense without questioning US predominance. ·   Works within the framework of NATO and maintains strong transatlantic ties. ·   Recognizes the need to invest in critical technology domains but does not aim to replace the preeminent position of the US. Practical Consequences: ·   Increases defense investments and capability acquisition in the context of NATO and/or the EU. ·   Invests in American-made equipment and systems. ·   Enhances innovation po...